Today the Labor Department (BLS) reported that the unemployment rate reached the highest level since 1983 even as the pace of job market deterioration continued to improve. U.S. employers cut payrolls by 216,000, less than consensus expectations of a 230,000 drop, but previously reported June and July job losses were revised upward by 49,000. The unemployment rate jumped from 9.4% to 9.7%. The losses were widespread across categories, including construction, manufacturing, and professional services.

Initial reaction to the jobs report followed the typical script we’ve seen all summer: with fewer jobs lost, a recovery must be around the corner. True, August’s loss of 216,000 jobs is a huge improvement over the 750,000 lost in January, but simply drawing an upward trend line fails to give me confidence that the economy will soon begin creating jobs. Digging into the BLS’s release, two important facts, largely overlooked in the press, suggest this report was less robust than the headline suggests.

First, the BLS each month includes a “diffusion index of employment change”, which simply measures the percentage of companies that are hiring workers. This is similar to the Institute for Supply Management manufacturing and services sector sentiment gauges, in that a reading of 50.0 represents a balance between those companies that are increasing and decreasing employment. In August, the BLS diffusion index showed that only 35% of employers are hiring workers, an improvement over July’s 30%, but a sobering number nonetheless.

The second suspect data point in the BLS release is the infamous “Birth/Death” adjustment. As we’ve pointed out before, the government attempts to estimate the number of jobs created or destroyed by the birth or death of employers in any one month. According to the BLS report, 118,000 jobs were “created” in August by the Birth/Death adjustment.

Without a doubt, the employment picture in the U.S. is susbtantially improved from several months ago. As a result, one must not be too bearish, because changes at the margin drive financial markets. But we remain cautious on equities in light of our long held view that too much debt on consumer balance sheets will weigh on economic growth, especially with unemployment approaching 10%.


This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the Funds or any stock in particular, nor should it be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell a security, including futures contracts.

There are risks involved with investing, including loss of principal. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risks as well. International investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Narrowly focused investments and smaller companies typically exhibit higher volatility. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. High-yield bonds involve greater risks of default or downgrade and are more volatile than investment-grade securities, due to the speculative nature of their investments. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors as well as increased volatility and lower trading volume.

Diversification may not protect against market risk. There is no assurance the objectives discussed will be met. Past performance does not guarantee future results Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual portfolio performance. Index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index.